Nadir Caselli in “Posti in Piedi in Paradiso” [2012 Italy]

Comedy is usually the pain killer for hard times, and Carlo Verdone offers some commercial relief through “Posti in piedi in paradiso” [Eng. Title: A Flat for Three].

Storyline:
By some coincidence, Ulisse and Fulvio end up sharing a flat with the estate agent who showed them the property, Domenico. With a dip in all the three middle-aged divorcees’ fortunes, also exacerbated by the economic downturn, they strike an unlikely friendship in order to get by. They stutter and make some poor decisions, but all ends well in this rather tame comedy, even if it is generally well written. The Italian title alludes to too many people attempting to mend their ways in order to find a place in an already crowded heaven – Ulisse, Fulvio, and Domenico being three among them.

A typical Verdone, it is packed with big stars like Pierfrancesco Favino and Micaela Ramazzotti, and Carlo Verdone also makes an appearance as Ulisse. This may be a well-made and above average comedy, but is still only Easy Viewing..!

Amazon.it Blu-ray Link


.

Continue reading

Posted in Italian Cinema | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Aurore Broutin in Dumont’s “Hors Satan” [2011 France]

Bruno Dumont’s reflections on the esoteric continues with another beautifully crafted film, “Hors Satan” [DVD Eng. Title: Out Satan].

Storyline:
A village loner, almost a vagabond, lives and sleeps in the marshes. The ranger wants him out of the land, but some in the village however seek his help because of his miraculous healing powers. A girl befriends him, offers food, and follows him like a disciple on his frequent spiritual ramblings. She wants to be his girlfriend, but he insists on a purely platonic relationship. But while his actions are largely benevolent, at times they’re also vindictive on people who he thinks have wronged…

Bruno Dumont tries to show us that there is perhaps no clearly defined border separating Good from Evil, that this border may at best be semi-permeable – each side absorbing elements from the other as needed. Or they may also be relative even. Throughout the film, the protagonist’s behaviour varies from being merciful and caring, to menacing and evil – separated through periods of stillness that also allow the audience to contemplate. Dumont’s earlier films used to be overly slow at times, with takes that stretch into several minutes when very little happens (like in La vie de Jésus and L’humanité). This film however is paced just about right, and alongside its lush cinematography, also vaguely reminiscent of an early Antonioni – the difference of course is the emphasis – here it is on the spiritual rather than the philosophical. But the most extraordinary feature of the film has to be its sound engineering, or lack of it. Dumont didn’t have a dedicated sound editor for this film, and most of it is captured as a single channel. It therefore has no music in the soundtrack, and the dialogues are also sparse. What we hear mostly are the sounds from nature, significantly aiding our contemplations through the film. This is nevertheless another magnificent film from the French auteur – Highly Recommended Viewing..!

Amazon.fr DVD Link

.

Continue reading

Posted in Bruno Dumont, France | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Nadia Mourouzi in Theo Angelopoulos’ “O Melissokomos” [1986 Greece]

Theodoros Angelopoulos will forever be considered among the greatest directors in world cinema. And his delightful cornucopia of work has influenced many a contemporary alongside the younger directors, in the same manner in which he too drew influences from other works whilst always retaining his own vision.

His films often explore politics, particularly recent Greek history, but also the human condition eloquently which in a way is quite reminiscent of Michelangelo Antonioni, and what drew me to his films in the first place. It has been a pleasure discovering (and re-discovering) some of his works since, and I’m glad to have finally had a chance to write something about this exceptional director, who unfortunately passed away earlier this year in a freak accident. His art is of course immortal, inspiring future film makers and audiences alike, and an exploration of cinema is simply incomplete without his films.

I shall start his filmography from a slightly lesser known but nevertheless accomplished drama, “O Melissokomos” [Eng. Title: The Beekeeper]. The second in Angelopoulos’ Trilogy of Silence, it is a journey into emptiness, and despair. Each of the films in this trilogy is magnificent and poetic, even though it was the final of the trilogy (“Topio stin Omichli” – “Landscape in the Mist”) that collected the most awards. The trilogy must be visited in their order, but make sure you have a box of tissues handy by the time you get to the unabashedly emotional final film. Angelopoulos has a trademark style of his own – his signature scenes are meticulously timed long takes, with great attention to their relevance to the characterisation and screenplay.

Here’s one shot from the film that would have made a director proud – the logistics involved, considering the year it was made is amazing. Yet it all looks so simple..!

[stream flv=x:/thirstyrabbit.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Theodoros-Angelopoulos-TR-Meticulous-timing.flv img=x:/thirstyrabbit.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Theodoros-Angelopoulos-TR-Meticulous-timing.jpg embed=false share=false width=512 height=382 dock=true controlbar=over bandwidth=high autostart=false /]


Storyline:
It is a momentous day for middle-aged Spyros – his daughter’s getting married, and is moving out to start her new life. He too has handed in his resignation at the school where he teaches, and has also decided to separate from his wife of many years. He will henceforth pursue his hobby of bee-keeping, a hitherto family profession, and embarks on his charted course with his van full of bees, chasing spring blossoms. On the way, a young girl hitches a ride in his van whom he drops off at the nearest junction, but she keeps bumping into him again at various stages of his journey – a distraction he’d have preferred not to have. Her youth and carefree abandon couldn’t be a greater contrast to his present frame of mind, and the more she throws herself at him, the more he pushes her away. But she nevertheless manages to get into his mind, and will cause Spyros to do things he’d never normally think of. Their journey together will come to an end at a disused cinema, where lot will be revealed about what it means to be in Spyros’ shoes…

To say this is one of the most beautiful films you’ll ever see is clichéd, and possibly an understatement. It does everything that good cinema can in the most simple terms, and more. The direction, screenplay, cinematography, editing, and acting (this is Marcello Mastroianni in top form) shine throughout the film. Angelopoulos works magic again with a tight-knit team who know exactly what he wants, and deliver in no small measure in the case of Eleni Karaindrou’s hauntingly melancholic soundtrack. Needless to say, this gem of a film is Highly Recommended Viewing..!

Amazon DVD Link
(I couldn’t locate the box-set that includes the complete Trilogy of Silence – will update this when I come across one)


.

Continue reading

Posted in Greek Cinema, Theodoros Angelopoulos | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Isabelle Huppert & co in Godard’s “Sauve qui Peut (la vie)” [1980 France]

After spending the best part of the 1970’s ‘in research’ as he puts it, Jean-Luc Godard returns to cinema emphatically with “Sauve qui Peut (la vie)” [Eng. Title: Slow Motion], an extraordinary dish nevertheless served with recognisable ingredients used in “Vivre sa Vie” and “2 ou 3 choses que je sais d’elle”, but also flavoured with politics, sociology, the customary cynicism, and topped with an extra dash of mordant humour. But this film is more than that – Godard philosophises and experiments with theories on art and film – an exercise that re-establishes his undiminished love for the medium that is cinema, and a tacit withdrawal of his earlier claim that cinema was dead!

About the film:
The French title roughly translates as ‘Everyone for himself’, which may pretty much be what the film portrays, but it is the English title (Slow Motion) that gives a hint of his experimentation here. The technique used in the film isn’t exactly slow-motion as used by François Truffaut quite beautifully in “Jules et Jim” – it is more like stop-motion (he calls it ‘décompositions’) used in some strategic moments of the film. Godard says that he was attracted to the idea of trying to find a different ‘rhythm’ with which to make cinema represent life, rather than the conventional 24 frames per second which we’re used to. He reminds us that during the silent era where there were technical limitations, it was possible to depict events using different rhythms, and the audience readily accepted it, helped of course by actors who understood and achieved different rhythms through their very performances. On the film’s concept, I’ll quote his own words (translated of course): “…the idea I had for this film was that of a character who comes back, or is seen by others as coming back, and yet his return is a departure from somewhere. It’s a problem that young people must experience – those moments when one has to not only find oneself, but also know where one wants to be in order to make a new start.”

Storyline:
Yep, there is one – Godard works with a narrative for a change. It is about three characters with very different outlooks, as observed through three chapters – The Imaginary, Fear, and Commerce. A fourth chapter, Music, connects these characters together along with the film’s theme music. Paul Godard, a film director and one of the three main characters, evades the amorous advances of a hotel bellboy to return to his flat, to realise that his girlfriend Denise had just left him – she’d quit her job in Television, and arrives at a village hoping to find some work at a local printing press. Denise is the second main character. The third is prostitute Isabelle, who goes about her business by confronting day-to-day challenges and embracing various opportunities. The chapters are essentially non-linear vignettes of these three characters interacting with people they know or encounter.

Intensely engaging, the film is also outrageously shocking in places, like the seemingly casual conversation Paul has with his football coach-friend, or the middle-aged client who wants Isabelle to pretend she’s his daughter, and the ‘orgy’ she later participates in with a businessman, his male secretary, and another prostitute. But there are also some memorable film moments like when Paul leaps over the table to wrestle with Denise, the ensuing stop-motion accompanied by theme music, and the final scene of Paul’s young daughter and his ex-wife walking away from the camera. The performances by the three main actors is excellent – Jacques Dutronc as Paul is convincing, Isabelle Huppert as Isabelle is incredible to say the least, and the exquisite Nathalie Baye shines as Denise – a role for which she even won a César – her first of many. The cinematography, editing, and soundtrack aptly complement the film’s theme. Needless to say, this is a superb Godard, and Highly Recommended Viewing..!

Amazon.fr Box-set Link
This is the only sensible way to add to your Godard Collection. The Gaumont box-set comes with no less than nine films chosen from different stages of his career, includes generous extras, and fills gaps left by some of the more famous UK/US sets.


Isabelle Huppert:
It’s taken a while but I’m glad to have finally started the filmography here of one of the most talented actresses ever to have appeared on screen – the magnificent Isabelle Huppert. Renowned for the challenging roles she often takes on, through her films she has made many an ordinary director look good, and fine directors great. There is very little I could possibly add to what has already been written about this shining gem in the jewel of European cinema. It is however reassuring to see her still active in films these days, and I look forward to writing more about her work in this blog.


.

Continue reading

Posted in France, Isabelle Huppert, Jean-Luc Godard | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

Magdalena Kronschläger & Anna Rot in “Tag und Nacht” [2010 Austria]

Whether it is about students funding their education or young women consciously making a lifestyle choice, storylines dealing with prostitution never seem to go out of fashion – au contraire, they’re only becoming more popular. Perhaps they should now be classified as a sub-genre in itself! 🙂

Talented Austrian writer-director Sabine Derflinger’s “Tag und Nacht” however explores this cliché-ridden topic a bit further than others, through its emphasis on characterisation rather than merely focusing on protagonists’ circumstances or unpleasant experiences. Nothing too dramatic happens to the characters, and neither are their clients and pimps depicted as monsters. She achieves this by forcing through her protagonists a series of dilemmas, and watching them respond.

Storyline:
University friends Lea and Hanna, on a whim (well – a toss of coin), decide to try out prostitution as opposed to waiting tables to make some money on the side. We’re led to believe Lea to be the adventurous one, with Hanna being the more circumspect. But as they settle down in their chosen profession, we get to see a different side to each of them, one that fleshes out their characters into individuals charting their respective lives, aided by their own morals and ethics.

In retrospect, “Tag und Nacht” (Day and Night) is an apt title for this film – apart from merely being the name of the escort agency that Hanna and Lea work for, it is also indicative of their character, and choices they make. The film is also beautifully made with some fine cinematography, editing, and sincere performances from all the main cast. Anna Rot in particular is exceptional and convincing as Lea, and apart from being gorgeous, she also reminds me of a young Maribel Verdú. As for Ms. Derflinger, she’s done a fine job yet again, but I couldn’t help noticing the screenplay being a tad inconsistent in one or two places – some references have loose ends that make little sense and are perhaps unnecessary even. It also makes me wonder whether the DVD I have is indeed the director’s approved cut – IMDB states that this film is 101 minutes long, but the main film in my DVD was only 97 minutes without taking into account any extras. Unless IMDB has got it wrong (which it does sometimes), this may well be a truncated version. Despite this, and having seen only one other film from this director to date (Vollgas), I quite look forward to exploring more of Ms. Derflinger’s work. Recommended Viewing..!

Amazon.de DVD Link


.

Continue reading

Posted in Austria | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment